Avian Gamers Network

Forum
It is currently Sat May 03, 2025 3:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:33 am 
Offline
Spammer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2002 8:43 pm
Posts: 3649
Location: Atlanta, GA
iJasonT wrote:
The Japanese are some of the most traditional, loyal, set in their way people. The surrendered after two bombings.


I don't think anyone can say with a straight face that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were mere "bombings". If the Germans or the Japanese had atomic weapons back then, the world would be a much different place right now.

_________________
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 6:36 am 
Offline
n00b 4 3v3r
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 8:01 pm
Posts: 5412
Location: The Seaside, UK
Dealing with suicide bombers

Not sure I mentioned it above, but it's very almost certain that the bomber died with their bombs making it the first suicide bombings to ever occur in the UK.

_________________
X2-PB

Pathfinder Kingmaker Campaign:
Gednan Malithanar - Wizard (1)
Dukin Thunderstrike - Ranger (1)

Star Citizen: - https://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/
AntanKarmola on their forums

Star Wars: The Old Republic: - Not really playing
Antare Karmola - Jedi Guardian (32)
Antan Karmola - Jedi Shadow (21)
Arianae Karmola - Gunslinger (20)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:34 pm 
Offline
Spammer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 11:41 am
Posts: 5201
Location: South Carolina, USA
Quote:
Some people don't like their history corrected! :P And a lot depends on point of view! :P


That's the crazy thing about facts.... point of view doesn't change them. :P


Quote:
Which scripture though? I can't read Hebrew so I can't say I've really ever read any scripture. The King James version of the bible that a massive majority of Christians read was retranslated and reinterpreted from an even earlier version which was still not the original version of the bible. It added things like an interpretation that it was ok to burn witches. Running stuff through Babelfish a few times (which doesn't have any politcal interests, and even though it far less sophisticated than a language scholar) should show you translation is dicey.


Quite right. The King James Version of the bible is a poor translation on various levels. (I hope I'm not offending anyone, here, but...) Most biblical scholars hold to the view that it is the original manuscripts which are to be considered the infallible and inerrant texts, not the translations or interpretations. Does this mean we all need to learn not only Hebrew, but Aramaic and Greek as well? Not at all, while I have found that my knowledge of Greek DOES help quite a bit with difficult passages in the New Testament, the newer translations a quite adequate for most uses, including authoritative teaching.

Given these things, we must continually update the translations every few decades on account of the way languages change and evolve over time.

Oh, and one other point - the KJV wasn't around during the 1400s. The Bible was still in Latin, and being witheld from the populace by the church at that time.

_________________
"Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But the tumult soon subsides." - Thomas Paine, Common Sense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 9:26 pm
Posts: 1338
Location: Chicago, IL
iJasonT wrote:
The Japanese are some of the most traditional, loyal, set in their way people. The surrendered after two bombings.

There is an interesting debate to be had there, Im just not in the mood to type it out.


We had a mock trial of Truman as to whether the bombs were necessary a couple years ago at school and I was on the prosecution. It turns out the Japanese were about to surrender before the bombs, and it wasn't just in theory, the Emperor has already set the surrender in motion. It's actually a very interesting subject, one that I ended up doing a load of research on even after the assignment was over.

There's all sorts of theories that we only dropped it to let the Russians know we had it, etc. There's actually some merit to these debates, and it's very clear that the A-bomb droppings were not necessary. Obviously it showed our strength which was good, but it cost a lot of innocent lives.

_________________
- Wiegraf Terrik
SWG: Human Commando/Pistoleer
WoW: Dwarvish Rogue (Herbalism/Alchemy)
EQII: Alazin, High Elf Wizard

Former Section 4 Director

"Please, if anyone were to play Obi-Wan it would be me, with the 'Luke, Luke save me' and the lightsabers going 'Vvvwiinnngg, vvwinggg, vvvWING!' -- Professor Frink


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:33 am
Posts: 6698
Location: Silver Spring, MD
ExarKun809 wrote:
iJasonT wrote:

There's all sorts of theories that we only dropped it to let the Russians know we had it, etc. There's actually some merit to these debates, and it's very clear that the A-bomb droppings were not necessary. Obviously it showed our strength which was good, but it cost a lot of innocent lives.


Forgove me for a second as I play devils advocate. Couldn't the terrorists be doing the same thing? If where are capable of throwing away innocent lives for a show of strength then in what why makes the WTC bombings any different?

_________________
Moge


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:52 pm 
Offline
n00b 4 3v3r
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 8:01 pm
Posts: 5412
Location: The Seaside, UK
iJasonT wrote:
ExarKun809 wrote:
There's all sorts of theories that we only dropped it to let the Russians know we had it, etc. There's actually some merit to these debates, and it's very clear that the A-bomb droppings were not necessary. Obviously it showed our strength which was good, but it cost a lot of innocent lives.


Forgove me for a second as I play devils advocate. Couldn't the terrorists be doing the same thing? If where are capable of throwing away innocent lives for a show of strength then in what why makes the WTC bombings any different?
This is exactly why the WMD case against Iraq was so important. WMDs as a show of strength is generally considered a bad idea. The only reason that you got away with it in Japan was because no one was, at the time, capable of retaliation. Currently any "show of strength" would have an immediate response and the consequences would be catastrophic.

_________________
X2-PB

Pathfinder Kingmaker Campaign:
Gednan Malithanar - Wizard (1)
Dukin Thunderstrike - Ranger (1)

Star Citizen: - https://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/
AntanKarmola on their forums

Star Wars: The Old Republic: - Not really playing
Antare Karmola - Jedi Guardian (32)
Antan Karmola - Jedi Shadow (21)
Arianae Karmola - Gunslinger (20)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 11:27 am 
Offline
Spammer

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 9:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: Ashburn Virginia
ExarKun809 wrote:
We had a mock trial of Truman as to whether the bombs were necessary a couple years ago at school and I was on the prosecution. It turns out the Japanese were about to surrender before the bombs, and it wasn't just in theory, the Emperor has already set the surrender in motion. It's actually a very interesting subject, one that I ended up doing a load of research on even after the assignment was over.

There's all sorts of theories that we only dropped it to let the Russians know we had it, etc. There's actually some merit to these debates, and it's very clear that the A-bomb droppings were not necessary. Obviously it showed our strength which was good, but it cost a lot of innocent lives.


It is easy to see in hindsight that they were preparing to surrender. Aerial reconnasance and intercepts all pointed to the Japanese preparing to defend the home island. This had to terrify Truman after seeing the losses just to take some of the small outer islands. We had 8 thousand dead taking Iwo and over 30,000 Japanese killed. The Japanese never surrendered in any of those actions.

Except for the shocking quickness of it I am not sure why everyone thinks a single nuclear bomb is so much worse than firebombs. 80 to 100 thousand were killed in a single night of firebombing Tokyo. The only argument for any of it is that in an all out war the people who produce the ammunition, guns, tanks and planes, even the food for the troops, are fair game.

_________________
"Chatfield, I think there's something wrong with our bloody ships." Admiral David Beatty, upon watching the battlecruiser Queen Mary explode at the battle of Jutland.

My name is Tobias Smith and I approved this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 3:14 am
Posts: 1408
Location: Atlanta, GA
tobiasds wrote:
It is easy to see in hindsight that they were preparing to surrender. Aerial reconnasance and intercepts all pointed to the Japanese preparing to defend the home island. This had to terrify Truman after seeing the losses just to take some of the small outer islands. We had 8 thousand dead taking Iwo and over 30,000 Japanese killed. The Japanese never surrendered in any of those actions.

Except for the shocking quickness of it I am not sure why everyone thinks a single nuclear bomb is so much worse than firebombs. 80 to 100 thousand were killed in a single night of firebombing Tokyo. The only argument for any of it is that in an all out war the people who produce the ammunition, guns, tanks and planes, even the food for the troops, are fair game.


I totally agree with you. Hiroshima was neccessary.

But Nagasaki? "We had to prove that we had more where that came from" doesn't sound like a very good reason to me.

_________________
Retired Weaponsmith


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2005 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 9:26 pm
Posts: 1338
Location: Chicago, IL
iJasonT wrote:
ExarKun809 wrote:
iJasonT wrote:

There's all sorts of theories that we only dropped it to let the Russians know we had it, etc. There's actually some merit to these debates, and it's very clear that the A-bomb droppings were not necessary. Obviously it showed our strength which was good, but it cost a lot of innocent lives.


Forgove me for a second as I play devils advocate. Couldn't the terrorists be doing the same thing? If where are capable of throwing away innocent lives for a show of strength then in what why makes the WTC bombings any different?


That's why I argued that the a-bombs weren't necessary in the trial. It was a long time ago since I studied the case, but I'm positive that there was abundant information at the time for the Truman administration to see that Japan was off its last leg and was preparing to surrender. I'll find something factual soon, but it was 4 years ago, so my memory isn't that great.

_________________
- Wiegraf Terrik
SWG: Human Commando/Pistoleer
WoW: Dwarvish Rogue (Herbalism/Alchemy)
EQII: Alazin, High Elf Wizard

Former Section 4 Director

"Please, if anyone were to play Obi-Wan it would be me, with the 'Luke, Luke save me' and the lightsabers going 'Vvvwiinnngg, vvwinggg, vvvWING!' -- Professor Frink


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:40 pm 
Offline
Spammer

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 9:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: Ashburn Virginia
We should probably continue this elsewhere, since I originally just came to this thread to show support to our Brits. I want to get back there and visit. My next planned trip was going to be Scotland but I may have to get down to England as well.

_________________
"Chatfield, I think there's something wrong with our bloody ships." Admiral David Beatty, upon watching the battlecruiser Queen Mary explode at the battle of Jutland.

My name is Tobias Smith and I approved this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:12 am 
Offline
n00b 4 3v3r
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 8:01 pm
Posts: 5412
Location: The Seaside, UK
tobiasds wrote:
We should probably continue this elsewhere, since I originally just came to this thread to show support to our Brits.
I'm inclined to agree, this is quite largely off topic now! I'm sure that Talon has brought up threads on most of the various topics discussed here over at the Moonworld Forums so any who want to discuss further, I suggest you head over there.

_________________
X2-PB

Pathfinder Kingmaker Campaign:
Gednan Malithanar - Wizard (1)
Dukin Thunderstrike - Ranger (1)

Star Citizen: - https://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/
AntanKarmola on their forums

Star Wars: The Old Republic: - Not really playing
Antare Karmola - Jedi Guardian (32)
Antan Karmola - Jedi Shadow (21)
Arianae Karmola - Gunslinger (20)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:52 pm 
Offline
Spammer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:10 pm
Posts: 3574
Location: Fairfax, Virginia
Anyone want to bring up again having a Politics Forum?

_________________
--The Hermit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:25 pm 
Offline
Spammer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 11:41 am
Posts: 5201
Location: South Carolina, USA
bigyak wrote:
Anyone want to bring up again having a Politics Forum?


As you know, I'm all for it. I see know reason why we can't at least have a trial run for it.

_________________
"Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But the tumult soon subsides." - Thomas Paine, Common Sense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 1:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 4:33 am
Posts: 6698
Location: Silver Spring, MD
4 more bombs went off today. 3 in the underground and 1 on a bus. I guess some of them didnt work and the ones that did where much smaller explosions.

Just curious, is there an election coming up in London? Also, has there been/should there be any political backlash from these bombings?
Lastly, have any of these been linked to the middle east?

sorry Im without TV or Radio and my Newspapers have yet to find me at my new address.

_________________
Moge


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:15 am 
Offline
n00b 4 3v3r
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2001 8:01 pm
Posts: 5412
Location: The Seaside, UK
iJasonT wrote:
4 more bombs went off today. 3 in the underground and 1 on a bus. I guess some of them didnt work and the ones that did where much smaller explosions.

Just curious, is there an election coming up in London? Also, has there been/should there be any political backlash from these bombings?
Lastly, have any of these been linked to the middle east?

sorry Im without TV or Radio and my Newspapers have yet to find me at my new address.
The four bombs yesterday were only detenator explosions, the explosives packed with them didn't go off so, in fact, no one was killed (I think there might have been one injury but nothing major). The police now have a lot of evidence which they can use to help with the hunt.

I'm not aware of there being any elections in London now until next year. Mayor Livingston is so anti-war and yet peacefully defiant that it is more likely to strengthen his political position (which is currently very strong anyway).

There is a possiblity of political backlash against Tony Blair, especially if public opinion decides to link these bombings as a result of the war in Iraq. The PM took us to war despite strong public opinion against it and as such has generally been considered a bad move politically for him. To avoid possible offence, I'm not going to go into the details here.

The first lot of bombers, I believe have been linked to Al-Qaeda (or at least a sub-sect of it). The police are currently running forensic tests on the explosives from the bombs recovered yesterday to determine if both sets of bombs came from the same place.

_________________
X2-PB

Pathfinder Kingmaker Campaign:
Gednan Malithanar - Wizard (1)
Dukin Thunderstrike - Ranger (1)

Star Citizen: - https://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/
AntanKarmola on their forums

Star Wars: The Old Republic: - Not really playing
Antare Karmola - Jedi Guardian (32)
Antan Karmola - Jedi Shadow (21)
Arianae Karmola - Gunslinger (20)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group