Talon1977 wrote:
this is the first time i've thought the movie was a great improvement over the book. meh.
In some ways, I'm inclined to agree with you (shock! horror!). Although you do have to bear in mind that the book was written by a 15 year old boy and the movie was probably written by a seasoned screenplay writer. I personally found that the books rambled a bit and the plot seemed to go off on tangents that didn't really matter too much. I think the author gets more caught up in the "day to day" story rather than the overall plot of the books.
Relating between the book and the movie. If a movie is based on a book, I almost always read the book first. I find that if I do it that way I can appreaicate the book in a manner "untainted" by having seen the movie. Invariably if I see the movie first, as I did on this occasion, I generally prefer that to the version portrayed in the book.
Having said that, there is a number of distinct concepts put forward in the two books that I don't really like. It also seems as if a few of these have been lifted straight from a D&D rule book! The concept of the Truename spell is one of these (a concept that I absolutely hate and have yet to see a balanced implementation of). Some of the plot points simply don't match up with concepts put forward elsewhere in the books and when these do occur, little explaination is given for them. Overall the main purpose for reading the books through is to find out information that has been purposely withheld from you, as a reader, earlier in the book. It is a method that I once heard someone describe as a "cheap trick" to keep you reading the whole way through.
For an overall evaluation, both Eragon and Eldest are worth reading and are entertaining, but there are points where you wonder what the point of that part of the story is and so require a bit of work to get through.