Talon1977 wrote:
well, you know... it's just not gentlemanly. putting a bullet in his head is so much more civilized.

There is something to what you are saying. It is more humane to kill your enemy, but also more cost effective.
Since taking prisoners means that you have to treat them within the parameters set by UN (I think, don't hang me up on it) of how to treat POW's
But again these non-lethal weapons can still cause alot of damage, like Manti said, plane crashes, but also many more senarios that could be caused, especially in the civil-life.
These laser weapons are apperantly very difficult to trace so they could be ideal for terrorist to use.
But also as the article said they can cause blindness, even though they have lighten the strength of the lasers.
Basicly that's why some are reluctant to have them in use.
_________________
1st Feb 2008
Madson wrote:
Woo hoo! another laptopper like me! Wow that sounded wierd just now...